When Good Books Make Bad Movies

When I heard Atlas Shrugged would soon be released, I was elated. I had just read the book.

I wondered why I had waited so long to read it, when it was practically a cult classic. I was hooked from the beginning and the only hard part to get through was John Galt’s infamous 60-page speech. I wanted to say, Geez, John, be a little more concise, will ya’? As my high school English teacher used to preach: Concise! Pithy! Epigrammatic!

The book does tend to be a bit repetitious in its message, just in case you didn’t get it the first time, Ms Rand drills it in over and over. Capitalism = Free Markets = Good. Only when you reward the entrepreneurs, when you allow them to be individuals and succeed in business in whichever way they choose, can society survive. Communism doesn’t work, although it wasn’t exactly Communism as such, but more of an unselfish society where no one must rise above the rest, when all things must be divided equally and all persons share in the wealth.

The novel is over 1000 pages long. There are a lot of subplots, a lot of expounding, a lot of character-building. But it’s all good. The slovenly brother of Dagny, the greedy, clueless family of Hank, the various hanger-ons and leeches. The successful, disappearing businessmen, the scientists influenced by inept politicians. The three brave world-changers.

It was a very engaging, very deep, very complicated novel. Perhaps Ms. Rand could have skinnied this down some, but she chose not to, and if she is a bit verbose, that particular shortcoming is not one which was troublesome to me.

How are they ever going to make a movie of it, wondered I? How will they capture all that nuance into a movie? Then I learned that the new movie was actually Atlas Shrugged, Part II. Ah. So better Netflix Part I because this rather anal reader and watcher of movies must see Part I before Part II. It would be blasphemy to do otherwise. 1 before 2. A before B.

(After rereading the above paragraph, I note that “Netflix” has now become a verb. When did that happen?)

Herr Schneider and I watched Part I. Herr had read Atlas Shrugged when most people did — back when we were young and self-perceived intellectuals. It had been many decades so he barely remembered it, just the message, but not any of the characters or the story.

Part I wasted no time. Bang! Got a lot of ground to cover! Even in multiple movie parts, we need to get going here. Lots of action packed into those scenes. If I hadn’t just read the novel, I wouldn’t have had the first clue about what was going on. I struggled to keep up. 

This is Hank and Dagny as they discover John Galt’s wonderful motor. Picture the scene. They are in an abandoned manufacturing plant. Windows broken, birds flying around. Debris laying all over the place. The place is huge, yet Dagny goes directly to the secret door wherein lies the motor.

Dagny: Looks like they just walked away.

Hank: Not much here.

Dagny: Too bad, I’d really like to figure out what happened here.

(Music swells)

Hank: Dagny. This is it! This is where they made the engine!

Dagny: You think it’s here?

Hank: I can’t believe all this stuff. Some of this is incredibly sophisticated.

Dagny: Unbelievable.

(Pause, as it dawns on Hank and Dagny, they both see it for the first time, and  they move reverently toward the workbench whereupon sits the aforementioned engine,  here in the old, abandoned factory strewn with litter and broken glass and bird poop.)

Dagny: Hank?

(Meaningful pause. Music swells a bit louder now)

Dagny: Atmospheric vacuum.

Hank: What?

Dagny: It’s known as the Casimir effect. It’s a small particle accelerator.

Hank: And this… must be a secondary cooling system, probably designed to eliminate excess heat generated during the process.

Dagny: Ex-ACT-ly. And this creates a magnetic field — in place long enough for the collapsing vacuum pressure to be captured.

Hank: The engine uses atmospheric vacuum to create static electricity! Now does it say anywhere on this document who designed this thing?

Dagny: I don’t see any names. We could get a list of the building employees?

Hank: We go to the Town Hall records, we find the last owner of the factory, we track it back from there. My God Dagny… this could change the world!

This scene was a whole chapter in the book, but took less than seven minutes in the movie.

After watching Atlas Shrugged, Part I, I am not sure I will bother with Part II. The movie seemed cartoonish to me, and events happened so fast my brain couldn’t keep up.

Sometimes, great books don’t make great movies. This was one clear example of that fact. How can a movie, even one in multiple parts, capture what it too 1000+ pages to explain?

It’s clear, it can’t.

Agree? No? Tell me.

8 thoughts on “When Good Books Make Bad Movies

  1. I just saw this movie on the Netflix myself, Lynn. Personally, I could barely sit through it. I found it confusing, and monotonous. I thought the no-name actors, and the fact that every scene looked like it was filmed at the local courthouse instead of a mansion, a company, a grand hotel, etc. gave it a very low budget feel to me. The never ending drives to find people to give clues to the whole John Galt mystery really had me over the edge. They updated the story so people were using cell phones and the internet for information, so why was it necessary to show our heroes driving all across the country (across what didn’t look a thing like the places we were told they were) when a quick phone call or a Google search could have sped the plot along much faster, possibly leaving room for more relevant bits of information that may have actually moved the story forward. I haven’t read the book, so this is the perspective of someone who went into it with no prior knowledge of the story, and no pre-conceived notions. But, now that I’ve seen the movie. I have no plans to watch the second half or read the book. Unless of course, you think it’s worth a read, and if you recommend it, I’ll give it a shot.

    Now, ~have you or do you plan to do a post on The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo? Because I just watched both versions, which I enjoyed very much, and am now reading the book.

    Thanks for letting me ramble. 🙂

    • I figured that this movie would be very difficult for anyone to get who hadn’t read the book. Readers were the target audience. I really loved the book and would recommend it, but did feel it could have been done with fewer words. There is so much good reading material today, it might not be worth the effort, as Ms Rand does tend to drill in her message over and over.

  2. I’ve been meaning to read Atlas Shrugged for years, but I always put it off. I have to say, your mention of a 60-page speech does not make me want to rush to the bookshelf and grab it 😉 (we do own it; my husband received it as a gift a few years back). But even not having read it, I would imagine trying to make a movie out of it would be very difficult. Some things are meant to stay on paper and off the screen.

    • Don’t mean to put you off by mention of that speech. I was alerted to the 60-page speech before I had read it too so I know what that’s like. Do I really want to do this? I thought it was worth it, and was hooked right away.
      so I would recommend it even though there are so many other good reads out there, it’s hard to devote that portion of time to just one novel.

  3. If ever you want to put someone off reading a book, tell them it has a 60 page speech in it!

    I’m finding that after several excellent tv drama’s such as “The Wire”, or “The Sopranos”, and similar, where they move at a slower pace, but therefore examine more detail, that in that respect, movies cannot cut it. “The Game of Thrones” books, also around the 1000 page mark take ten episodes of fifty minutes. They expand a few scenes and let others out, but the pacing helps and it gives a worthy comparison to the book. I just don’t get how you can do it in 2 hours.

    • Yeah, I know about the speech. So, I tried The Wire since it got so many good reviews. I have to say, it was difficult to understand for me. All the street language was hard for me to figure out. I did love The Sopranos and lately am into Breaking Bad. Atlas Shrugged probably should have been a series.

      • The Wire does have a learning curve to it. But that is for me one of the good things, because it makes you think / learn a bit. Most of that was deliberately left that way, with out convenient speech that explains it, like you get in many drama shows.

        I love Breaking Bad also. Only 8 more episodes of that left (next year).

Comments gratefully accepted:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s